An Open
Letter to Mahavir Karna
Dear Mahavir
Karna,
What a life you
had to live! An entire adult dream nourished only to destroy a worthy man, an inadvertent
rival in glory notwithstanding. Your anger dates back to society’s refusal to
let you think out of box. They wanted you to be a charioteer, and you will be
nothing less than the greatest archer. Even the warrior brahmin would not take
you as a disciple. You however went on to be trained by his guru Parshuram. There
also he took away your freedom to use your knowledge. Undaunted, you challenged
Arjun in the family testing grounds; but the by now familiar and overused
‘sutaputra’ adage denied you the chance, and seeing in you a firebrand rival of
Arjun, Duryodhana befriended you. You were bought over with a paltry crown, like
a Kalashnikov, lock stock and barrel. You now became a prisoner of your own
ambition. The best years of your life you were in bondage created by yourself.
Fine, you
were grateful to him. But was it a part of your gratefulness that you
participated in the Draupadi undressing show? Far from stopping him from the
barbarous behaviour, you suggested it to him! Did it fall in place of even the
Sutaputra calling, which you hated? Would any other sutaputra have done what
you did? Was it worthy of even a sutaputra? Yet you continued playing the
grateful card! D gave you a little principality, and called you a king. And you
thought that was a fair enough price for your archery by which you could have
subdued the whole world. What a poor self-esteem! Would any fool agree to sell
oneself so cheaply to a greater fool? And you were literally a Mahavir.
Then you
participated in D’s stealing of cows! I cannot conceive how a Mahavir would
feel worth it stealing cows, no matter they were a king’s cows, no matter how
grateful he may be to a thief-friend. Why
did you go to Panchala to win Draupadi? Your long experience with being a
sutaputra taught you no lessons? Did you ever think the proud Drupada would
accept you as a son in law? Or did you want to destroy the suta-kshatriya
divide you hated since your birth? Did you want to establish a classless
society where only the powerful will rule? Then why did you meekly submit to Draupadi
when she quoted the divide? I am afraid even if you had won her you would not
have a second thought in giving her away to D if he felt interested. And if a
Brahmin won her, why didn’t you leave it at that? What was the need to show
your ire to a rightful choice of the princess? Didn’t Arjuna show valour beyond
even your dearest friend? Then why didn’t you allow the powerful take the
prize? You fought all your life for adhikar of the deserving, didn’t you? Then
why did you string your bow when a brahmin deserved the princess by his adhikar
of power? If you didn’t accept that a sutaputra cannot wield arms, how did you
accept a brahmin cannot win a kshatriya princess? Aha, you wanted to win her
for your friend! Was that your grateful currency too to buy a bride for him
after he failed to fulfill the very basic requirement, and you thought a
princess born of fire would accept a marriage in proxy? Weren’t you divided
against yourself? Dear Mahavir, you were sliding down your status, strangely
blinded by the dark prince.
What an
admirable piece of work is man! How infinite in faculty, yet how insufficient
in reasoning! When it came to deciding
right action you thought in your mind which was filled with anger, and had no
place for your heart which was a very noble piece. Conversely, when it came to
action grandfather Bheesma thought with his heart which was filled with love
for his father, and put his mind away which could have reasoned out. He forgot
the spirit of words in his devotion to the form of words. He remembered his
affectionate father, but did not remember the king in him. The promise he made
was meant for his father, but it also covered the king. He advised Dhritarastra
later to be a king first, then a father. When he pronounced his own pledge, was
he doing it for the father, or the king? Isn’t the dharma of a son to protect
the dharma of the father, ensure the stability of the kingdom? Did he do that? He confused the king-father with the
father-king, and caught in his own irrational words, was led to the Great War
helplessly. He could not swallow his pride and allowed the whole country to be
swallowed by the cataclysmic war. He was born to rule, but chose to serve, and
what a master to serve! Surely that extension wasn’t necessary. Isn’t it what
the Vedanta says as the greatest illusion man suffers? Amrutasya putra, a child
of eternity, living as anrutasya putra, a child of lie, willingly. Tragedies
are not scripted in heaven; they are written and enacted by the actors
themselves.
And what you
did? You too were born to rule, but delighted in serving the devil! Your heart
knew D was in the wrong, but you too could not swallow your precious pride, and
continued to support him. You even did something worse. You took care to see
that the fire in D did not die down. Both of you lived half lives, driving a
wedge between a thinking mind and a feeling heart. There was no balance in your
lives. Therefore, though both of you were noble as angel, both of you turned
out to be great threats to the stability of the world. You had to be eliminated
for public good and justice, but of course at a huge price. Both of you stuck
to your rights, and forgot your responsibilities. Both of you had acquired
great powers, but both of you forgot that if power is not used for the
protection of society, it will corrupt, and when absolute power corrupts, it
can destroy absolutely.
I rate you
greater than even Bheesma and Drona. The Grandfather had the protection of a
boon. But you had deliberately relinquished your divine protection, yet
remained unvanquished in a fair fight. Two or three times Krishna had to rescue
Arjun from your deadly missiles. Arjun fought the war with revenge in his
heart. Even that he wanted to relinquish for the good of the society, but
Krishna convinced him he needed that revenge for the good of the society.
Krishna tried to convince you about your misplaced loyalty, but you would not. Wasn’t
Arjuna justified after what you did to his wife in public? What justification
did you have to join hands with the evil prince? When you stood before him you
knew that you were face to face with your little brother. Yet you fought to
kill. You were a living contradiction, and you knew it. The Grandfather was a
living regret, and he too knew it. His knowledge allowed him to be saddled with
a promise that he would not kill the five brothers, and your knowledge saddled
you with a promise that you will kill none of them except Arjun. You chose to
destroy the ablest of them probably because you thought that two supremely
capable persons couldn’t coexist. Professional jealousy? But wasn’t it mean for
a Mahavir of your status? After the Grandfather’s fall the five brothers
reconciled with him, and would have gladly done so with you, their bravest
eldest, but you had no time to create that balance in your life, for you had
lived too long with the venom of D.
And what
about the homicide of Abhimanyu? By no stretch of imagination I am prepared to
condone your participation in the barbarous hunt. That stripling of a genius
wasn’t ever even the remotest part of your revenge. It was just like your
participation in the Draupadi undressing performance. Both were wild hunts,
unrestrained by any civilized values. And imagine you were an enthusiastic
perpetrator at both sites! Dear Mahavir, what was the matter with you? Why did
you stifle your noble heart? Your cruelty towards yourself was one of the
greatest and saddest in the history of humanity. You are the tragic prince
Hamlet in Mahabharata.
Let us
suppose for a moment you had killed Arjun and won the war for the Kauravas,
more than 90% of whom had already been killed. The other pandavas would be
captured and executed by D, and your great friend would be the king. Now would
that be a very salubrious situation for you? Would you have felt fulfilled?
Till now you lived on the dream of killing Arjun, and be accepted as the
greatest by the world. After Arjuna’s death you could relax on your ‘greatest’
throne. But that old warrior Drona will not accept you. Kunti, whom you have
already recognised as your biological mother, would be dead. Krishna would have
failed. Gandhari might force Dhritarastra to go on vanaprastha. D would be
fully unrestrained in his evil adventures, and you would be a mute witness, or
you would also join him? Could you count how many Draupadis would be undressed
all over his kingdom? You would be a Mahavir living posthumously.
You believed
in the dignity of the individual, didn’t you? They called you a sutaputra, and
denied you chance to fight a kshatriya. Wasn’t it ironical that you were bought
over by a kshatriya to fight another kshatriya as his instrument? It was your
battle, but D hijacked it for his good, and you submitted meekly. Was it in
keeping with your idea of dignity? You not only digested this insult, you
upheld and defended it all your life as a great honour! What a Mahavir you
were! You could have single handed won a kingdom, and created another
Hastinapur to challenge Arjun. Even Bheesma and Drona would have been powerless
against your divine protection. I always wonder why this didn’t occur to you.
We will now look at your life from a different angle. It was a struggle
between society and individual. Can the selfish dividing caste lines be
permitted to undermine a genius, stop a worthy achiever from manifesting his
potential? You were born with divine grace, and the blind social conventions
tried to contravene grace itself! So you were up in arms against it. Your anger
was not misplaced, your desire to rewrite the conventions was not undesirable,
but you practised deceit to achieve that. You made your guru Parshuram believe
that you were from a brahmin family. And when he discovered the lie he put a
permanent bind on your ability to use your full potential. You wanted to
acquire ultimate power from a Brahmin to use against the kshatriyas to remedy
the injustice done to a sutaputra. If it was right for you, practising a little
adharma to punish another adharma, why did you cry foul when Arjun killed the
Grandfather with his consent? You probably wanted a society where power is the
ultimate language. Wasn’t it a greater and more dangerous divide? If wild power
is allowed to rule, it will turn the whole world into a wilderness. All three
of you, the Grandfather, the Guru, and you were the ultimate warriors of your
times. Did any good accrue to the society from any one of you? You wanted to
remove the flaw in the society, didn’t you? But you were flawed yourself!
Physician, heal thyself. If you come back, you will notice that Hitler of our
times tried to execute the same principle, rewriting history by gathering the
powers of history into his hands. He wanted to destroy the Jews because they
didn’t fit into his plan.
I can’t of course forget Kunti’s role in all that happened to you. The
poor princess paid the price for her undue curiosity to test the power of
mantra, and for being part of a rigid aristocracy. She was gentle as a flower,
a lonely melody in a wild jungle; could she fight the all powerful aristocracy?
The rest of her life was a living hell. A moment’s lapse cost her her entire
life. She was the saddest and noblest of all women in the epic story. But you
never forgave her. Her loving heart always yearned to hug you, feel proud to
call you her eldest son, and cursed herself every day for abandoning you. She
was a sacrifice in the altar of the convention of society. If you thought you
were a sacrifice at the altar of a blind society, Kunti too was. You were a
man, a warrior, so you could rebel against it. But Kunti? She was a woman, a
gentle creature, obedient to the convention. And when you participated in the Draupadi
drama, didn’t you support what you said you hated, the irrationality of a male-dominated
society? At an earlier era the daughter of Janaka had been another. She at
least knew that Sri Rama intensely shared her agony, but Kunti had no one to
share. She suffered alone, and heroically. She was another tragic character,
intensely human, but a prey to human predicament.
Tragic heroes, critics say, are men and women who live with intensity,
are endowed with great abilities, but are basically flawed. They occupy very
high positions in the society; are very sensitive, sometimes forbiddingly
sensitive; are passionate about their actions; are very honest and incapable of
double dealing, but all these gifts are mismanaged. They are often impulsive, self-contradictory,
imbalanced, or intolerant. One will love them, admire them, but pity them too.
You were no doubt a rare piece of humanity with great valour, charity, courage,
excellence in your chosen field, respect for values, transparent in your
actions, passionate about what you thought was your dharma, but you had a
single overriding objective of destroying Arjun, though he personally had done
no wrong to you. Given a choice, he would probably have accepted your challenge
to him in the family test, but he too was the prisoner of a powerful tradition.
The difference was he had accepted it because he was a part of it, but you did
not because you were outside of it. However, you had no reasons to pick up that
noble man to avenge the social norms. The Pandavas would have accepted you as their
eldest, and fallen at your feet at any stage of the war, had Kunti revealed the
truth, but you would not accept them even if you knew it before the battle plans
were drawn! Your expensive pride as the greatest, and your unreasonable rejection
of mother Kunti got the better of you, and led you to unite with the devil
himself! That was your nemesis. You burned your boat behind you, and signed
your own undoing with Mephistopheles! You are a tragic hero in a cosmic play.
The likes of you always strike awe, but rarely light up the stage. I love you,
respect you, but feel sorry for you too, dear Mahavir Karna. Forgive me for
saying a few hard words about you, but you shall always stand tall as an emblem
of the human predicament in this great story of life, stuffed with endless
variety.
a fan of
yours
No comments:
Post a Comment